To do a good job in the work of government organs, we should focus on several issues.
It mainly talks about five aspects.
1、 Clear responsibilities, find the right position, correct the guiding ideology of work
Marxist philosophy tells us that people have thoughts, all their activities are dominated by their own consciousness, and different ideological motives will produce different work results. As far as organ work is concerned, sometimes the work is not done well and the quality of work is not good enough. We need to find the root of the problem from the guiding ideology of work and solve the problem from the world outlook.
1、 Clear responsibilities, find the right position, correct the guiding ideology of work
Marxist philosophy tells us that people have thoughts, all their activities are dominated by their own consciousness, and different ideological motives will produce different work results. As far as organ work is concerned, sometimes the work is not done well and the quality of work is not good enough. We need to find the root of the problem from the guiding ideology of work and solve the problem from the world outlook.
It mainly talks about five aspects.
1、 Clear responsibilities, find the right position, correct the guiding ideology of work
Marxist philosophy tells us that people have thoughts, all their activities are dominated by their own consciousness, and different ideological motives will produce different work results. As far as organ work is concerned, sometimes the work is not done well and the quality of work is not good enough. We need to find the root of the problem from the guiding ideology of work and solve the problem from the world outlook. For example, some comrades sometimes think about the problem out of a kind of flattering psychology, rather than focusing on the improvement of combat effectiveness and the needs of the army construction. They put too much emphasis on whether leaders like it or not, and often they do not repay their happiness or worry; Some people do not work from the actual work, but have personal purpose, too much value the work voice and the impact on their growth and progress. When encountering difficult and risky personal fame and interests, they are reluctant to bear, always want to push others to do it, in order to protect themselves with philosophy; What's more, good luck, do a little work to fear that others do not know, can stand praise but can not afford criticism, lack of the necessary staff ladder, silent dedication of service awareness and moral cultivation. In the end, some comrades have deviated from their work guiding ideology. The starting point of work is wrong, and a lot of energy has been spent on personal interests, but they have not exerted any effort in the matter. The result is that the style of the organ floats, even leads to the wrong decision-making, and may induce and encourage the formalism and exaggeration of the style of the army, and affect and restrict the quality of the implementation of the work and the construction of the troops. This requires us to correct the guiding ideology of work first. How to correct the guiding ideology of work? I think we should focus on solving three problems.
First, we should solve the problem of "why is the purpose of work" well. As cadres of the government, what are we doing our work for? Whether it is for the public or for the private, whether it stands on the position of the army construction or the stand of personal interests, is it for the sake of winning or for personal fame. It's not a small problem. To be bigger is a problem of world outlook, values and even outlook on life; To be small is a starting point of work. The starting point is for the construction of the army, and the work will be real. If you want to do so, the organization and leadership can see it; If it is for personal fame and profit, it must be false and false. It should be known that the chiefs have grown up from the staff. Your kind mind, want to get the leader like, the leader can also see, to tell the truth is understandable. But we can't talk about politics and work on the basis of whether it is profitable for individuals. This is not a big reason, but by the strong political nature of the work of the organs. We do the work of the organs and do the work of the senior leading organs, and are all Party members and cadres. We must firmly establish the political consciousness of "building the party for the public, strengthening the army and defending the country", and we must take the national interests and the undertakings we are engaged in above all aspects, and always maintain a high sense of political responsibility and a strong sense of revolutionary cause, and consciously regard as the chief of the Party committee as a good assistant of staff To be highly responsible for the construction of the army is the guiding ideology and code of conduct for the work of the organs. This is the first ideological problem that we should solve in the work of the organs.
Secondly, we should solve the problem of "what is the responsibility of work". As the main body of the work of the organs, the staff, the officers and assistants are all the staff assistants of the party chief. Serving the head, serving the army, being responsible for the head and the army is the duty of the cadres of the organs. We provide advice, organization and coordination, inspection and guidance, service guarantee, information consultation and other work for the party chief, and should become the think tank and thinking base for the party chief in terms of comprehensive situation, research and decision-making, and become a hub and bridge for connecting the superior and subordinate, left and right neighbors, and the army and the outside. This is the responsibility of the cadres of the organs. How to solve the problem of "what is the job responsibility"? I think, as the cadres of the organs, we should first give ourselves an accurate position. The organ serves the party chief. The final decision-making is the party chief, as the cadres of the organs, can not have offside and dislocation suspicion, speaking and handling affairs must maintain the authority of the head; The organs serve the army. They should treat each other warmly. Do not put out a group leader who is "high in the organ, and small at a glance". Speaking is bigger than the head. The manner of speaking and acting should maintain the image of the organ. Second, we should have a strong and conscious sense of service. There are two sentences called: good service to the head can serve the army, and understand that the army can serve the leader. I think this is not unreasonable, which is required by the outstanding service of the work of the organs. In the end, the work of the organs is service, which is to act according to the intention of the party chief, from the needs of the army construction, and organically unify the two to the higher level orders and instructions and the decision-making intention of the party chief. In this way, the work of the organs can be done well and done in place. Third, we should have the moral cultivation of being a ladder. There is a simple reason everyone knows: standing at the front desk is always the party chief, behind the scenes service is always our organs. As an official, we must have the cultivation of being a ladder of people, and take on the style of making contributions and the character of being silent and willing to give. There are two idioms, one called bear the burden of humiliation, the other is called "to seek perfection through wrongdoing". We should have this spirit in doing the work of the organs. Even if the service leaders bear the humiliation, they should also bear the burden. Even if the "wrongs" are involved, we should also seek for perfection. In this way, it is not to belittle our cadres, but to the basic requirements of the work of the organs for our ideological and moral cultivation. An excellent cadre of the government should be indifferent without losing his mind, confident and modest, calm and courageous, rigorous and practical. To solve the problem of "what is the responsibility of work", it is also necessary to emphasize that we should pay attention to the study of common sense of policy and regulation. At present, there is a phenomenon in the work of the organ sometimes, either the things that should be managed by themselves are not managed or do not know to go into control, which leads to the work in neutral; Either they can act in their own way and work in a different position. "They are not in charge of the Kang across the pot platform". One of the important reasons why this situation occurs is that some comrades are not familiar with the basic regulations and regulations and are very vague about the responsibilities of their departments. Like the regulations of the headquarters and the regulations on political and industrial affairs, the regulations on the work of the organs are clearly defined. I hope that comrades should learn from time to time and make clear their respective responsibilities and authorities. One organ cannot produce "two voices". Only when each person performs his duties and performs his duties according to his duties can the work of the organ form a harmonious and tacit situation.
Third, we should solve the problem of "what is the actual performance of work". As the saying goes: how about a tree depends on its fruit; How a person is depends on his contribution. To correct the guiding ideology of work, we must solve the problem of "what is seen in the actual performance of work". What does the work performance look like? It is to see if you are firm in implementing the instructions from the superior, whether you understand the intention of the head of the party, and whether you know the situation of the troops as well as whether you can make good ideas, high ideas and big ideas for the party chief, and whether you can fulfill the duties you should perform and do well in the work you should do. In the end, it depends on your ability and quality, and your contribution to the work of the organs and the construction of the troops. When it comes to work performance, it is easy to think of the word "building a successful career". In fact, according to the causal effect, only by "starting a career" can we talk about "building a good job". If we always make vulgar relations around small circles of personal interests, and do our best to please the leaders and promote the promotion of officers by opportunistic means, what kind of "industry" can we establish? In other words, you should not do well in your work, and "career" has not been established. Who will consider your "building a good job"? Therefore, we should take responsibility for the Party committee head, the construction of the army as our own responsibility, and take the improvement of the level of military construction and combat effectiveness as the starting point, think about the leaders' thoughts, think about the needs of the army, work diligently, be honest and honest, do the right thing well, and work hard to improve the ability and quality, Only by the organization and the head of the organization can they finally be recognized. Want to take shortcuts, play with the small skills of carving insects, rely on mixed life, ultimately can not stand.
2、 Touch the situation, grasp the fire conditions, pay attention to the request for instructions and report
The report of asking for instructions (including written report and oral report) is a regular work of the cadres of the organs, which is reflected in all aspects of the work of the organs. It can be said that from the shift handover to the development of each work, it is inseparable from asking for instructions and reporting. It is not difficult to find that the same report is for advice. If some comrades report well, they can attract the attention and appreciation of leaders, and make the situation mastered and suggestions put forward can enter the work and enter the leadership decision-making; Some reports and requests are good in intention, and good reporting is also beneficial for the decision-making and army construction of the head. However, due to the lack of emphasis on methods and methods, and the art of reporting, the leaders did not adopt the report, but also left a bad impression on you. It said that you were squeaky and could not speak ideas. So, how can we do a good job of asking for instructions and reporting? I think at least, we should grasp the following points:
First, we should "think well". Now some of our staff members report work, even if they have no clear information about the situation, they come to the head in a hurry, but the attitude is very positive. The chief asked: why does this happen? Do you have any basis for this proposal? Or ask three unknown; Or only one or two; Or say it when asked, and say it wrong. The reason is that we are not well prepared. We do the work of the organs, whether it is written report or oral report. Before reporting, we must first make sure that the situation is correct, which is the minimum. What is the subject of the report? What is the significance and value of the report content? Must make sure that you have a good mind and know it well; Secondly, it is necessary to make clear and clear, and consider the logical relationship of the time, place, cause, progress and consequence of the event, and how to make the chief listen to it in a reasonable way; Again, there should be some ideological preparations that may be asked by the head of the block. We should be familiar with some policies and regulations related to reporting incidents, that is, we often say that we know the truth and know more about it. You should think about and prepare for these questions before reporting. Moreover, it is necessary to ask for instructions when reporting, do not report for half a day, and do not propose solutions and suggestions. This is not the case at work. We have considered all these factors carefully, and we have thought about how to say it to the head. We will have prepared for several possible questions from the head. If we report again, there will be no questions.
Second, we should say it accurately. Accurate and normative presentation of your suggestions and opinions is the basis for leaders' approval and adoption. But some of our comrades don't pay much attention to this, either the language of the situation is not standardized, the expression is not accurate, and the words can not be judged by the sentence; Either make a proposal containing paste, let the head of the difficulty, approval is not, not approval is not; Or not grasp the reporting scale, "small official said big words.". If you report a violation of discipline, you suggest that "strict punishment must be given according to the party discipline". This is not the tone of the staff advice, but it has become the chief of the decision“ It is the matter of the party chief to punish the party chief if "no" must "and" not to punish ". What you have to do is to make clear the situation, provide relevant policies and regulations to the head of the Party committee. If" must "or not, the chief shall make decisions, and make suggestions like the words of the staff, and make sure that they are accurate and appropriate. Other comrades also don't know the format and writing standard of the documents for the report. It is not a report for one thing, but a number of items for reference in a document submitted for instruction, so that the leaders don't know how to approve it. These problems must be highly valued by us. The correct decision intention of the party chief comes from the accurate information consultation of the organ. Fluent talk and accurate expression are not only related to the quality of ordinary work, but also the success or failure of wartime operations for our military organs. It is important to make vague and ill - spoken words. In this regard, there are profound lessons from all over the world.
Third, we should make a long story short. It is to be concise, concise and concise, and go straight to the theme. As a typical example, it may be known that in the early days of anti US aid to the DPRK, there were serious difficulties in logistics support for volunteer forces. There were only six words in the emergency telegram sent by President Peng to the Party Central Committee: hungry, without food and lack of clothes. Very simple. Only six words illustrate the status of the force and the needs of the volunteer forces. Some of our comrades, however, have been reporting in a series of nonsense. The longer the language is like a ramen, the more and more the ideas are not available for half a day. If there is a young staff member who summarizes and reports at the end of the year, he comes up with "in the past year, under the guidance of the superior business department, under the leadership of the group army and the Party committee head, with the help of the deputy director of the director...", the director has come to 56 "Xia" in a row. Before he has finished the "down" words, the director intercepts his words and says, "do you want to say you in the past year?", Under the leadership of the Party Central Committee with President Jiang as the core? Where are so many "down"? You said you did something this year, wouldn't you! " The long-term and long-term talk and procrastination are the taboo of reporting work, even the disrespect for the leaders. Why do leaders have so much time to listen to you reporting like storytelling? It is not a rule to give advice or good policies, but to open up the door and not to circle. It is very important that staff members can speak long and short, communicate with leaders in the shortest time. This is what is required by the characteristics of this particular group of our army.
Fourth, we should say it cleverly. When we are cadres of the organs, we should give suggestions to the heads for recognition and adoption, and sometimes we should speak some skills. Changing your mind often has a good effect. I saw such a very interesting and vivid story a time ago, saying that two monks practice Zen, and the addict of smoking wants to smoke and is afraid to break the commandments. One went to ask the master and asked, "can you smoke when practicing?", Immediately reprimanded by master; The other went to ask for advice and asked, "master, can you practice smoking at the same time?". "You have Buddha in your heart, of course," the master said happily. In the same way, a little change will result in different results. In fact, the essence lies in the speaker mastering the direction of the other party's thinking and the focus of attention. When we are the staff, we should make suggestions on reporting to the head, and also pay attention to the key issues and main thinking directions of leaders' attention, and focus on the key work of the army construction and the most concerned issues of the leaders.
Fifth, we should see the opportunity to say. The so-called "opportunity" means that we should pay attention to the opportunity and occasion of asking for instructions and reporting. Let me give you a few examples. Let's think about it: the head of the board is opening the Standing Committee (Research cadres), and you come in with a folder. Is that appropriate? The head is receiving local staff. Would it be appropriate for you to report confidential matters without any help? The chief is calling, you don't know to avoid it, so standing in the head office is silly, is it appropriate? For example, you follow the chief and go down to the army. The chief is trapped and wants to rest on the car for a while. You don't see the head's mood and interest, and you can talk about it all the time. Is it appropriate? Sometimes, the head of the Organization convened a meeting, made a summary speech and asked if you have any comments. The one thing that the meeting would listen to was polite words. It means that the meeting is over and the directors will not speak again. Do you stand up as the staff member and say, "chief, I have a suggestion". Is that appropriate? What have you done? wait. It's funny to say, but things like this often appear in our daily work. This is what the leaders often say is "not sensible" or "no eye". Further, it is also a personal cultivation problem for cadres of the organs. Therefore, when we are cadres of the organs, we should not ignore the time and occasion of the report. How to grasp it, without me to say more, we all know that only some of our comrades do not pay much attention to or often ignore these sections in their work. You pay attention to these, grasp the fire, can play the due reporting effect, the head will also feel you have a good eye, handle the right thing. In this way, the head and our organs will have a very good understanding. Of course, in case of any emergency that can not be delayed, you should not take any time or occasion into account. The report should be reported in time. The head will not be bothered and blamed.
Another point is to ask for instructions to report according to the procedures. Reporting in case of an accident is the basic procedure for asking for instructions and reporting, and also the basic common sense that an organ cadre should have. In general, our organs have done well in this regard. Now there is a situation that needs to be corrected well. It is that an agency comes to ask for advice and report, and the head has approved it. You have done the same. The leader of the undertaking results does not know. For example, one of our headquarters sent me a petition, which I saw and passed on to the chief of staff for approval. The chief of staff needed the approval of the chief of staff at first glance. After the examination and approval of the chief of the army, the staff took them back and gave them the orders, but they never answered. Not only did I not know the results of the undertaking, neither the chief of staff nor the chief of military knew. This is a problem of information transmission is not in place and reporting procedures are missing. Here, I would like to emphasize that our organs should pay attention to information feedback in the future when they ask for instructions and report, and develop the habit of "return to return to the back". We should give feedback to everything and respond to each item. This is an essential procedure for requesting instructions for reporting. In this way, it is convenient for the head to know the situation in time. Moreover, the Department organizes activities, sends a telegram and a notice, and cannot send it to the head in charge and the force. If the work is finished, it is necessary to remember to send a copy to other heads and departments so that other heads can timely grasp the situation of the force and let other departments know what the force is doing. This is also an aspect that our organs need to make up for and pay attention to in the report of request for instructions.
3、 Pay attention to methods, think and do well in investigation and research
Investigation and research is a methodological science with strict and scientific characteristics and excellent art. It is the basic leading method of our Communist Party and the basic skills that the cadres of the organs must master. Chairman Mao said, "without investigation, there will be no right to speak.". I think it can also be said that if we do not conduct investigation and research, we can not be regarded as a competent cadre of the organs. When we do the work of the organs, we often go to the army to inspect and guide the work and conduct investigation and research. Some comrades can find problems and provide valuable information and consultation for the decision-making of the Party committee leaders. Some comrades said that the army went on like this, without preparation for investigation and without research topics; Or no problem can be found; Or if you find any problems, you can go online; And, the problem has been found, but it can't extract things and find solutions. This shows that some of our comrades have not mastered the procedure and methods of investigation and research, and have not treated the investigation and research as an art. So, how can we do a good job in investigation and research? There are many experiences in this field, and there are all books about the work of the organs. I hope that comrades should pay attention to learning and learning. Here, I want to make an exchange with you on some basic issues that need to be grasped in order to do a good job in investigation and research. The main points are as follows:
First, we should know what leaders want. It is to understand the intention of the party chief accurately. This is what we must pay attention to at any time to do well in the work of the organs. If the party chief does not understand the intention of the Party committee head and fails to implement it according to the intention of the party chief, the work of the organs will be scattered and the army will not talk about centralized reunification. We must understand a common sense. We should check and guide the work, conduct investigation and research, etc., and the whole work of the organ is carried out around the intention of the party chief. Now, before our organs get off the army, the heads of the government concerned will basically convene a meeting. This meeting, is the chief is telling you what he wants. As for some special deployment of the investigation and research topics, we should grasp the intention of the party chief, understand thoroughly. Only if you know what the leader wants, you can know what to look up and then think about how to look up. For example, when conducting security inspection, the head said: we will go on this time, mainly to check the problems. As a result, you came back to report. The whole story was a great situation of the army security. The chief didn't hear any problems for a long time. Your investigation is meaningless. Therefore, we have been able to inspect and investigate the troops, and we have accurately understood the intention of the party chief, and we know what the leaders want, and we have grasped the direction of work and the focus of the investigation. This is very important.
Second, we should know what to look up. Theoretically speaking, it is necessary to prepare for investigation and research. This is very important to do a good job in investigation and research, but it is often ignored by some comrades. The reason why we can not find out the problem or find out the problem and don't know what to do is that the preparation before the investigation is not enough. How to prepare? What are you going to prepare for? First, we should select the subject of quasi investigation. It is to focus on "what leaders want", list the research content that you think can reflect the intention of the party chief, and where to investigate, find who to investigate and what materials will be collected, and list them one by one before the investigation. These are the things you're going to look up. Knowing what to look up, you will be able to investigate and aim at it, and you can avoid the problem of "fish in the water," blind people riding blind horses, and not knowing where to go ". Then, we should put forward scientific research hypotheses according to the selected research topics. What is the research hypothesis? It is the assumption of the object of investigation and its relationship with the related phenomena. In other words, it is necessary to make clear the specific investigation ideas. This kind of idea and thought is based on scientific theory and practical experience, not made up by imagination and by virtue of the sky, but it is to be verified by you in the investigation. It can make the research subject more specific, and it can help you to collect materials and analyze and think while you are investigating, and play a guiding role in indicating the direction of thinking. Some of our comrades have made full preparations in advance for the quick investigation and the high quality of the reports. Another point is to prepare some relevant information. This is also an indispensable preparation before the investigation. Go down to find out what, before going, we should prepare the policies and regulations that the research topic may involve and the relevant information so as to be able to timely compare the policies and regulations in the investigation, draw lessons from the relevant experience, and make the investigation more targeted.
Third, we should know what the method is. What I'm talking about is a question of "how to look up.". This is the most critical link to determine the quality of investigation and research. There are many methods of investigation, such as listening to reports and field surveys, comprehensive investigation and typical surveys, questionnaire survey and opening of symposiums, etc. You know it, too. But there is often a situation where the same method is used to work, and you can use it to get nothing. Why is that? This is an art and practical experience of investigation and research, which I want to emphasize today. So how can we use the methods of investigation and research well, dig out the deep contradictions and real problems that leaders pay attention to and the army exist, and make accurate and real first-hand materials available? This is a practical methodology problem. It depends on people constantly groping, accumulating and summarizing in practice according to their own experiences and experiences. It is not possible to rely on others to tell and copy the rigid set. Some things are not good for words. But some basic elements must be grasped. First, I will listen. We go down to the investigation and listen to the reports. It sounds wonderful, so you think they do a good job. To this, you should keep awake, listen to the voice, do not listen to the report, you will be moved and believe. Which doesn't want to say it in good ways? If it is that, you remember it first, and then check it. Second, I will see. It should be known that the respondents generally have a certain psychological defense. The hidden things often happen. The scenes you show may be carefully arranged in advance. More of the problems you want to understand are not wanted to be seen by others. Don't be confused by one scene. In this regard, we should learn from Premier Wen Jiabao, break through his defensive psychology and often let the respondents feel unprepared to obtain the real situation. Third, I will say. It's also an investigation attitude issue. Don't put out a set of high-rise shelves, ask a question to speak to arrogant people. In a service provider's attitude, the party chief shall tell the party chief's intention and your investigation plan, and the place where others need to cooperate, and calmly tell the respondents that they can establish good interpersonal relationship with the respondents, respect the personality and privacy of the investigated person, so as to obtain the understanding and support of others. In this regard, comrades of our organs should learn from the leaders of our group army. The leaders of our group army have strong affinity, and we should know that "the official without shelf is the real official". Put down the shelf, people will tell you the truth, the truth. Fourth, we should be able to find objects. The target can be found correctly, which can improve the efficiency and quality of the investigation. If it is not found well, it is possible to be busy and can not find the problems and bring the troops a lot of trouble. What kind of respondents are suitable for? It is to find the "objects" related to the research subject, representative in work, typical in units, special in personnel and hierarchical to the materials you want to collect. This is called "taking shortcuts", which can often achieve twice the effect of half the effort, etc. Grasp these basic elements, flexibly use the survey methods in good books, and add your attitude of seeking truth and practicality, not reaching the goal, we can improve the quality of our investigation and find out what you want.
Fourth, we need to know what to do after I come back. What do you do back? As you all know, to write an investigation report, you should report to the leader. Here, I just want to state one point: without good ideas, I can't write good articles. In a narrow sense, as a carrier of research results, the survey report is just a common style, and it is not difficult to master. Anyone can write a report, but it is not easy to write a high-quality and significant survey report. This requires us to put our efforts into "thinking out". Where does the idea come from? Chairman Mao said that we should come from practice. In terms of investigation and research, we should learn from our deep understanding of the intention of the party chief, accurate grasp of relevant policies and regulations, and in-depth analysis, scientific judgment, careful reasoning and thinking refining of investigation materials. All the work done in the preliminary investigation, the large amount of materials and data collected are prepared for our "post production". What we should do after returning is to make a hard and detailed analysis and summary of the materials and data obtained from the investigation. Through deep and repeated rational thinking, we can extract valuable ideas and Research Countermeasures for the decision-making of the party leaders. In a word, we should make the vivid materials from the investigation into "crafts". Otherwise, the report is a plain and light pile of words, and all the work you did in your previous investigation will become "walking through the field". This requires us investigators to pay attention to the perceptual knowledge from investigation and raise them to rational thinking to solve problems through the phenomenon. The purpose is to reveal the essential rules of the army construction contained in the investigation materials objectively, truthfully and accurately, and put forward the solutions and suggestions to solve the problems in a clear, pragmatic and creative way, so that the investigation results become the decision basis of the Party committee leaders and be used to guide the actual work. Only by achieving this goal can the investigation and research be successful.
4、 Communicate in time, actively negotiate and strengthen work coordination
Coordination is a common task in the work of the organs. The purpose is to achieve unity of thought, policy and pace, so that all departments at all levels can form a joint effort and work together. It is not the local saying that "work is meeting, management is charge, coordination is drunk". Some people have summed up the work as "one big and two difficult". The so-called big one lies in its wide coverage, coordination everywhere, and there is no time and time. Where conflicts appear, coordination should be followed up; The so-called difficulty lies in the coordination between people, each has its own opinions and has its own basis; Coordination is also a non power work, which can only be negotiated, explained and mediated with the other party, and cannot be ordered. Coordination is very important to do well in the work of the organs, and it is also a basic skill required by the cadres of the organs. With this basic work, we can deal with all aspects of relations better, open up the channel for the work, and make full use of various positive factors to improve the efficiency of work. Many comrades in our organs have rich experience in this regard. But there are also problems such as the deviation of conveying spirit, understanding intention bias, forgetting things missing and coordinating in time and not in place. Here I focus on some basic issues to grasp in coordination work, and talk about my own experience.
First, respect each other. Coordination is to deal with people. Respect for and understanding of people is the minimum requirement. As the saying goes, "if you want people to respect themselves, you must respect yourself first", "people respect me a foot, I respect one Zhang". If we don't pay attention to this, it is difficult to do anything that is easy to coordinate. From the perspective of work, coordination is no more than solving contradictions. For the coordinator, most of the problems to coordinate are the work problems, and it is completely normal to have such or some contradictions. This also determines that we must "not be right to people" when we do coordination work, respect each other, consider problems from other side's perspective, fully listen to and adopt reasonable opinions and suggestions from others. In particular, the units in charge of power, money and things should, according to the objective conditions, proceed from maintaining the overall situation, being conducive to work, and coordinate objectively and fairly. We must not proceed from personal good and evil, feel emotional and be kind to each other. For example, some units or personnel ask you to do something, as long as it is not a matter of principle, they can not "be the boss", one-sided emphasis on "no compromise", press not to do; We should not go against the intention of leadership and follow the so-called "mass line" without principle. On the basis of full consultation, we should make good "fine adjustment" to ensure that we do not violate the policy and regulations, but also conform to the objective reality and facilitate the work.
Second, we should be familiar with the personnel. As the saying goes, "acquaintances do things well.". What we talk about is to pay attention to interpersonal communication, and it is easy to communicate when coordinating. The same thing, find someone you know, and meet a person who asks "your name" to coordinate, and how the result is self-evident. When people are familiar, they can produce a harmonious atmosphere and a compatible psychology, and it will be much more smooth to coordinate. Some people conclude that modern people's success needs to have two factors: one is excellent ability quality, the other is good interpersonal relationship. As the saying goes, "a good man and three help.". A person, no matter how smart and capable, to do a good job requires the help of others. The people with strong coordination ability are mostly good interpersonal, or give others good feelings or people are familiar with you. It's hard to imagine that you don't know how to set up the institutions of the superior business departments, who are the leaders in charge of the brigade and the head of the counterpart business section. Can you coordinate your work well? Impossible things. This requires us to work hard on familiar personnel, especially to keep in touch with our superior and subordinate counterpart business departments, friendly neighbor units and internal personnel of the organization. In this way, a successful pass can be achieved to create a good environment for work coordination. Of course, to communicate with people, we should also keep a clear mind, distinguish whether public transport or private intercourse is not separated from good and bad, and we should be friends; We should not take communication as the name, public and private, and confuse work and personal life.
Third, we should discuss and handle it. It is in coordination that we should weigh the words and not carry the brand. Although our cadres are in accordance with the leadership instructions to coordinate their work, they cannot do the same as the "two heads", and put forward a set of pretext of acting with the purpose and threatening the emperor to order the princes. To know the coordination power given by the Leadership Committee, it can only be used as the basis for adjusting contradictions and solving problems. It is impossible to become a chip to improve your identity. Even if it is to convey the leadership instructions, it is necessary to make full explanation that the leader cannot dominate others by the tone of leadership. This is not only a method of coordination, but also a principle of coordination. Because there is no direct subordinate relationship between the two parties, it is impossible to use the administrative order method and the command language. Only by consulting with each other more, making clear the truth with a moderate breeze and rain, and finding common ground for dealing with the problems can the problem be properly solved. If you have a stiff attitude and impose your own opinions on people, the problem will not be solved. Even the coordination of the related matters of the subordinate forces should be prevented from being simple and rigid. As an organ cadre, as long as it is a matter of coordination, we should negotiate and handle them. We must not have hierarchy in mind. We cannot feel that their level is higher than others, but they are superior to each other. In case of contradiction, they will force their will on the other side with pride, ignore each other and ignore their legitimate rights. Of course, we can't lose the principle of dealing with conflicts because of being courteous. If you are afraid of that, you can tolerate it. You should strive for it without being humble and active.
Fourth, we should grasp the proper position. That is, coordination work should be in place but not offside. If the coordination is not in place, it is a breach of duty, and offside is a "foul". Although the specific procedures for coordination work are not clearly defined in many cases and the boundary of offside is sometimes not well understood, in any case, things beyond the scope of authority cannot be done, work procedures can not be violated, and reports can not be submitted for further reference. The coordination of the organs is essentially to assist the head. This has a question of responsibility and authority. In general, it is flexible to handle the situation without violating the general intention of the head. Otherwise, we cannot take the lead without authorization. In particular, for the coordination of some major matters, timely request for report and strictly follow the intention of the head. From the perspective of the procedure of coordination, there are three situations: one is that the report needs to be asked from the bottom up, and the report should be submitted step by step according to the procedure and division of labor; The other is that the leader can be directly asked for instructions. Before and after reporting to the leader, it is necessary to communicate with the direct leaders of the Department in a timely manner; In another case, when a special emergency is encountered, the direct leader is not in office and can not wait. It can simplify the procedure, report while handling, or report to the leader after handling. We cannot see procedural work as a problem and burden, but as a necessary stage of coordination. In addition, coordination work should prevent and overcome the tendency of "emphasizing human feelings and worldliness, neglecting principle and discipline". The exchanges among cadres of the organs are extensive, involving both the upper and lower levels and the various aspects. The relationship and human relationship in communication are often unavoidable. It is understandable that some things are done perfectly. However, there are limits to the human sentiment and worldliness, and must not exceed the limits of principle and discipline. Only the coordination of human feelings and rules and disciplines is satisfactory, but at the same time, hidden dangers may be planted, which leads to the adverse consequences of "things are done, mistakes have been made". This degree must be grasped.
Fifth, we should listen to it. It is to pay attention to the harmonious language art“ All the four sides should be coordinated by one mouth. Can talk round both ends, can not say two tired. A word can be done as a big thing or a bad one. Reasonable and proper language can not only express the intention of coordination, but also can enter the brain, and realize the communication with the coordination object as soon as possible, so as to make it accept happily. First, respect each other when speaking. Use more of the tone of discussion, and do not speak in a commanding tone. Although you are implementing the instructions of the head, don't forget that all of us are government cadres. Using the instructions of the head to crush people can not only achieve the purpose of coordination, but also hurt the harmony and affect the feelings. Secondly, the intention should be clearly expressed. Use words must be accurate, and the instructions of the superior and the intention of the leaders should be used to regulate their own language. They should not be "crooked mouth monks", open their mouths and go in tune so that they don't know what you want him to do. Thirdly, pay attention to the interest in speaking. We should make efforts to make people listen to each other and be willing to listen to it by making efforts in the vivid and flexible language and enhancing the attraction, appeal and persuasion. Never talk about choking. It is irritating to choke. Besides, we should grasp the language. For coordination, it is not derogatory to see who says what to say. In coordination with parallel organs and departments, the tone of language should be mutual respect and consultation tone, but also should not give up the principle of big; For the coordination of leaders, the tone of language is often in the tone of asking for instructions, humility and inquiry. In short, language is a college question. How to use it properly and listen to it in speech depends on the people's heart in practice.
5、 Understand the intention, be fully prepared, and do a good job as an attendant
It is a regular task for cadres to follow their leaders to participate in activities organized by higher authorities, local governments or friendly neighboring forces, or to conduct investigation, research, inspection and guidance in the next army. How to do a good job of the entourage and make the chief satisfied, as an organ cadre, we need to grasp and pay attention to it. There are also a lot of jokes and appearances in this respect. For example, when starting out, the chief decides what time and where to board the bus. Some of them don't pay attention to the amount of advance, so they let the chief wait for you there; On the way, some of them didn't know how to get there, didn't figure it out in advance, and pretended to be very clear, so they took the wrong way to the chief; When you come back, the chief said goodbye. The leader who saw you off has already got on the bus and is ready to leave. You are still shaking hands with others one by one under the bus to say goodbye. Some even can't find anyone, and so on. These are all things with names and surnames. I believe everyone has met them. Some people once summed up some of our staff officers following the chief of the army as "being late for departure, sleeping with a car, calling for meals, pouring as soon as you drink, and asking for nothing". Although the work of an entourage does not take as much time as writing materials, it can reflect the experience and accomplishment of an official. How to do this work well? I think we should focus on the following five aspects.
First, be familiar with the chief. To be familiar with the chief is the premise of doing a good job. If you are not familiar with the chief and do not know about him in advance, it is difficult to do a good job in his entourage. For example, where the chief wants to go, there are many old comrades in arms, so he may visit them in his spare time. If you know about this situation, you can be prepared in advance. Once the chief says he wants to go, you can contact him in time and lead the way to visit or visit him, so there will be no delay; If the chief executive has the habit of getting up early and taking a walk, you don't know, and gets up on time or wants to sleep in. In the morning, if the chief executive wants you to take a walk with him or make a temporary arrangement, you will be unprepared. How to get familiar with the chief? The key is that we should pay more attention at ordinary times and learn more about the work and living habits of the chief, so that we can get familiar with them gradually. If you are a new chief executive, or if you are not familiar with the chief executive when you are on a business trip with him for the first time, you should ask his drivers, civil servants, officials who are familiar with the chief executive, and even those who are familiar with his old unit for information. As long as we pay attention to this problem, we can do it. The key is to have this awareness.
Second, be considerate. As the saying goes: "be ready before you go, there is less trouble on the way.". As we all know, the key to preparing for going out with the chief is to think carefully and be fully prepared. In my opinion, there are four aspects to be done: one is to make clear what to do. After accepting the task of going out with the chief, we should understand the intention and specific task of the chief in time, and ask if we are not clear. Second, we should bring all the things we need. There will be many inconveniences when you go out. You should bring all the necessary things before you leave. It's both comprehensive and easy to carry things. It's easy to miss things if you don't prepare well, and it's cumbersome to bring too many things. The third is to understand how to go on the road. If the route has been passed before, and the distance is not far, it is easier to lead the way. If you are leading the way for the first time, and the distance is long, you should not only look it up on the map, but also know it from the insiders, so as to make sure that you have a clear idea. Don't pretend to understand, lead the way blindly, make jokes and delay things. Fourth, be prepared for what the chief executive may ask. Leaders often use their travel time to ask questions and learn about relevant situations. For example: the relevant policies and regulations of the project, the basic information of the unit, and so on. If you don't make preparations in advance, the chief will think it's useless to take you; If you have prepared in advance, you can not only respond calmly, but also take the initiative to introduce some information to the chief, who will feel that "this cadre can do it.".
Third, behave in a dignified manner. As the chief's entourage, whether it's going to inspect and guide the troops, or participating in the activities of the superior and neighboring units, or whether it's going to meet the chief in public places or in private, you should be soberly aware that you are an office cadre and the chief's entourage. You can't be coy or pretentious, and you can't be foolhardy or swagger, We should be strict with ourselves and be decent in our words and deeds. In real life, some government officials are not doing well. Some are too timid in public and too casual in private; Some drink a few glasses of wine, do not know how old they are, walk around, holding a cigarette, holding a leader's waist, brotherhood. Following the leader, your words and deeds not only represent yourself, but also reflect the intention of the leader, and represent the image of the first level organ. You can neither take advantage of the power of the leader, nor lose your identity to agree with others. Especially when you follow the commander in the army, you should be strict with yourself in life, and don't give the army any trouble. We should see that after the chief arrived in the army, the comrades below have made great efforts to take care of your life. Don't put forward any non demands to embarrass the subordinates, let alone show dissatisfaction or even make use of the excuse. Don't look at these trifles in life, they have a bad influence on the relationship between superiors and subordinates, the image of the chief and your personal image.
Fourth, live in your eyes. Government officials should be observant and attentive, and observe problems in a sensitive and meticulous way. That is to say, they always think about things in their heads and live in their eyes. Why do some cadres give their leaders and comrades the impression of being very clever, while others feel numb? The fundamental difference is that the former has a lively eye, while the latter is confused. For example, other leaders in the vicinity of the unit should visit the leader, and the entourage should meet him at a place convenient for observation. When the visiting vehicle arrives near the camp, he should inform the leader in time that he can't wait in the room, but he is also in the room, and the visitor doesn't know when he arrives at the door. The entourage should always think about things in his mind and take the initiative to serve the chief. In particular, common sense things should not be allowed to be said and done by the chief. For example, when a chief comes to a unit, he should take the initiative to introduce the relevant personnel and briefly explain his intention; Before participating in each activity, it is necessary to supervise and inspect the preparation work in time, and inform the relevant personnel to arrive at the activity site in advance to meet them; In the process of the chief's work, he should not leave casually, but should do a good job of assistance at any time; If the chief executive proposes to see a certain leader or go to some place, he should greet the relevant units and personnel in advance; If conditions permit, spare time activities should be arranged, etc. In a word, during the period of following the chief, the entourage should always lean up, use their brains, arrange everything well, and strive to make the chief's work and life more pleasant.
Fifthly, the reaction should be smart. The attendant's work is not only to deliver cigarettes and water, but also to arrange accommodation. In that case, the chief should take a civil servant. The so-called smart response is to achieve: without waiting for the chief to finish speaking, you will know the following content; Without waiting for the chief to speak out, you will be able to understand the meaning. I would like to emphasize that the entourage should give advice and ideas to the chief at the right time. In this respect, the directors of our organs have done a good job. For example, when they go to the brigade and regiment to inspect and guide their work, the leaders of the brigade and regiment often ask questions when they report to the leaders, which need to be answered by the leaders. Some directors can quickly explain and explain the relevant policies within their scope of work, as well as the work of their own business, so as to buy time for the leaders to answer questions. When talking with the chief executive, you should pretend to be a little confused and ask him to give you more advice to show his cleverness. That's smart. When we are working in government departments, we often have to face a number of heads, and the heads inevitably have different opinions. You should try to find the combination of the heads' opinions, learn to make ends meet for the heads, do not pass on words that are not conducive to communication and unity, and take appropriate measures to delay or avoid them, so as to weaken the positive tone and intense emotion of the heads at that time, Avoid head-on confrontation of different opinions. When it is found that the chief executive studies a certain problem, or there is something wrong with the brewing decision-making, the entourage should try to enlighten the leaders. In 203 BC, when the battle between Chu and Han was very fierce, Han Xin sent a letter to Liu Bang to ask him to be the false king of Qi. Liu Bang was furious when he saw it. But at that time, the situation was very unfavorable to Liu Bang, which could not prevent Han Xin from becoming king. If we don't agree to his request, it will be difficult to clean up the situation in case of defection. At this time, counselor Zhang Liang quickly pulled Liu Bang's sleeve with his hand and whispered. Liu Bang immediately changed his words and said, "the eldest man calms down the princes and becomes a real king. How can he become a fake king?"? In this way, Liu Bang went through the difficulties with dignity. Zhang Liang's work is very beautiful.
The work of government organs is a big article. It's really learned. If you let the comrades here speak, I believe they can speak very well. I'm just talking about my own views based on my own working experience. If there is something wrong, I'd like to be criticized and corrected.
1、 Clear responsibilities, find the right position, correct the guiding ideology of work
Marxist philosophy tells us that people have thoughts, all their activities are dominated by their own consciousness, and different ideological motives will produce different work results. As far as organ work is concerned, sometimes the work is not done well and the quality of work is not good enough. We need to find the root of the problem from the guiding ideology of work and solve the problem from the world outlook. For example, some comrades sometimes think about the problem out of a kind of flattering psychology, rather than focusing on the improvement of combat effectiveness and the needs of the army construction. They put too much emphasis on whether leaders like it or not, and often they do not repay their happiness or worry; Some people do not work from the actual work, but have personal purpose, too much value the work voice and the impact on their growth and progress. When encountering difficult and risky personal fame and interests, they are reluctant to bear, always want to push others to do it, in order to protect themselves with philosophy; What's more, good luck, do a little work to fear that others do not know, can stand praise but can not afford criticism, lack of the necessary staff ladder, silent dedication of service awareness and moral cultivation. In the end, some comrades have deviated from their work guiding ideology. The starting point of work is wrong, and a lot of energy has been spent on personal interests, but they have not exerted any effort in the matter. The result is that the style of the organ floats, even leads to the wrong decision-making, and may induce and encourage the formalism and exaggeration of the style of the army, and affect and restrict the quality of the implementation of the work and the construction of the troops. This requires us to correct the guiding ideology of work first. How to correct the guiding ideology of work? I think we should focus on solving three problems.
First, we should solve the problem of "why is the purpose of work" well. As cadres of the government, what are we doing our work for? Whether it is for the public or for the private, whether it stands on the position of the army construction or the stand of personal interests, is it for the sake of winning or for personal fame. It's not a small problem. To be bigger is a problem of world outlook, values and even outlook on life; To be small is a starting point of work. The starting point is for the construction of the army, and the work will be real. If you want to do so, the organization and leadership can see it; If it is for personal fame and profit, it must be false and false. It should be known that the chiefs have grown up from the staff. Your kind mind, want to get the leader like, the leader can also see, to tell the truth is understandable. But we can't talk about politics and work on the basis of whether it is profitable for individuals. This is not a big reason, but by the strong political nature of the work of the organs. We do the work of the organs and do the work of the senior leading organs, and are all Party members and cadres. We must firmly establish the political consciousness of "building the party for the public, strengthening the army and defending the country", and we must take the national interests and the undertakings we are engaged in above all aspects, and always maintain a high sense of political responsibility and a strong sense of revolutionary cause, and consciously regard as the chief of the Party committee as a good assistant of staff To be highly responsible for the construction of the army is the guiding ideology and code of conduct for the work of the organs. This is the first ideological problem that we should solve in the work of the organs.
Secondly, we should solve the problem of "what is the responsibility of work". As the main body of the work of the organs, the staff, the officers and assistants are all the staff assistants of the party chief. Serving the head, serving the army, being responsible for the head and the army is the duty of the cadres of the organs. We provide advice, organization and coordination, inspection and guidance, service guarantee, information consultation and other work for the party chief, and should become the think tank and thinking base for the party chief in terms of comprehensive situation, research and decision-making, and become a hub and bridge for connecting the superior and subordinate, left and right neighbors, and the army and the outside. This is the responsibility of the cadres of the organs. How to solve the problem of "what is the job responsibility"? I think, as the cadres of the organs, we should first give ourselves an accurate position. The organ serves the party chief. The final decision-making is the party chief, as the cadres of the organs, can not have offside and dislocation suspicion, speaking and handling affairs must maintain the authority of the head; The organs serve the army. They should treat each other warmly. Do not put out a group leader who is "high in the organ, and small at a glance". Speaking is bigger than the head. The manner of speaking and acting should maintain the image of the organ. Second, we should have a strong and conscious sense of service. There are two sentences called: good service to the head can serve the army, and understand that the army can serve the leader. I think this is not unreasonable, which is required by the outstanding service of the work of the organs. In the end, the work of the organs is service, which is to act according to the intention of the party chief, from the needs of the army construction, and organically unify the two to the higher level orders and instructions and the decision-making intention of the party chief. In this way, the work of the organs can be done well and done in place. Third, we should have the moral cultivation of being a ladder. There is a simple reason everyone knows: standing at the front desk is always the party chief, behind the scenes service is always our organs. As an official, we must have the cultivation of being a ladder of people, and take on the style of making contributions and the character of being silent and willing to give. There are two idioms, one called bear the burden of humiliation, the other is called "to seek perfection through wrongdoing". We should have this spirit in doing the work of the organs. Even if the service leaders bear the humiliation, they should also bear the burden. Even if the "wrongs" are involved, we should also seek for perfection. In this way, it is not to belittle our cadres, but to the basic requirements of the work of the organs for our ideological and moral cultivation. An excellent cadre of the government should be indifferent without losing his mind, confident and modest, calm and courageous, rigorous and practical. To solve the problem of "what is the responsibility of work", it is also necessary to emphasize that we should pay attention to the study of common sense of policy and regulation. At present, there is a phenomenon in the work of the organ sometimes, either the things that should be managed by themselves are not managed or do not know to go into control, which leads to the work in neutral; Either they can act in their own way and work in a different position. "They are not in charge of the Kang across the pot platform". One of the important reasons why this situation occurs is that some comrades are not familiar with the basic regulations and regulations and are very vague about the responsibilities of their departments. Like the regulations of the headquarters and the regulations on political and industrial affairs, the regulations on the work of the organs are clearly defined. I hope that comrades should learn from time to time and make clear their respective responsibilities and authorities. One organ cannot produce "two voices". Only when each person performs his duties and performs his duties according to his duties can the work of the organ form a harmonious and tacit situation.
Third, we should solve the problem of "what is the actual performance of work". As the saying goes: how about a tree depends on its fruit; How a person is depends on his contribution. To correct the guiding ideology of work, we must solve the problem of "what is seen in the actual performance of work". What does the work performance look like? It is to see if you are firm in implementing the instructions from the superior, whether you understand the intention of the head of the party, and whether you know the situation of the troops as well as whether you can make good ideas, high ideas and big ideas for the party chief, and whether you can fulfill the duties you should perform and do well in the work you should do. In the end, it depends on your ability and quality, and your contribution to the work of the organs and the construction of the troops. When it comes to work performance, it is easy to think of the word "building a successful career". In fact, according to the causal effect, only by "starting a career" can we talk about "building a good job". If we always make vulgar relations around small circles of personal interests, and do our best to please the leaders and promote the promotion of officers by opportunistic means, what kind of "industry" can we establish? In other words, you should not do well in your work, and "career" has not been established. Who will consider your "building a good job"? Therefore, we should take responsibility for the Party committee head, the construction of the army as our own responsibility, and take the improvement of the level of military construction and combat effectiveness as the starting point, think about the leaders' thoughts, think about the needs of the army, work diligently, be honest and honest, do the right thing well, and work hard to improve the ability and quality, Only by the organization and the head of the organization can they finally be recognized. Want to take shortcuts, play with the small skills of carving insects, rely on mixed life, ultimately can not stand.
2、 Touch the situation, grasp the fire conditions, pay attention to the request for instructions and report
The report of asking for instructions (including written report and oral report) is a regular work of the cadres of the organs, which is reflected in all aspects of the work of the organs. It can be said that from the shift handover to the development of each work, it is inseparable from asking for instructions and reporting. It is not difficult to find that the same report is for advice. If some comrades report well, they can attract the attention and appreciation of leaders, and make the situation mastered and suggestions put forward can enter the work and enter the leadership decision-making; Some reports and requests are good in intention, and good reporting is also beneficial for the decision-making and army construction of the head. However, due to the lack of emphasis on methods and methods, and the art of reporting, the leaders did not adopt the report, but also left a bad impression on you. It said that you were squeaky and could not speak ideas. So, how can we do a good job of asking for instructions and reporting? I think at least, we should grasp the following points:
First, we should "think well". Now some of our staff members report work, even if they have no clear information about the situation, they come to the head in a hurry, but the attitude is very positive. The chief asked: why does this happen? Do you have any basis for this proposal? Or ask three unknown; Or only one or two; Or say it when asked, and say it wrong. The reason is that we are not well prepared. We do the work of the organs, whether it is written report or oral report. Before reporting, we must first make sure that the situation is correct, which is the minimum. What is the subject of the report? What is the significance and value of the report content? Must make sure that you have a good mind and know it well; Secondly, it is necessary to make clear and clear, and consider the logical relationship of the time, place, cause, progress and consequence of the event, and how to make the chief listen to it in a reasonable way; Again, there should be some ideological preparations that may be asked by the head of the block. We should be familiar with some policies and regulations related to reporting incidents, that is, we often say that we know the truth and know more about it. You should think about and prepare for these questions before reporting. Moreover, it is necessary to ask for instructions when reporting, do not report for half a day, and do not propose solutions and suggestions. This is not the case at work. We have considered all these factors carefully, and we have thought about how to say it to the head. We will have prepared for several possible questions from the head. If we report again, there will be no questions.
Second, we should say it accurately. Accurate and normative presentation of your suggestions and opinions is the basis for leaders' approval and adoption. But some of our comrades don't pay much attention to this, either the language of the situation is not standardized, the expression is not accurate, and the words can not be judged by the sentence; Either make a proposal containing paste, let the head of the difficulty, approval is not, not approval is not; Or not grasp the reporting scale, "small official said big words.". If you report a violation of discipline, you suggest that "strict punishment must be given according to the party discipline". This is not the tone of the staff advice, but it has become the chief of the decision“ It is the matter of the party chief to punish the party chief if "no" must "and" not to punish ". What you have to do is to make clear the situation, provide relevant policies and regulations to the head of the Party committee. If" must "or not, the chief shall make decisions, and make suggestions like the words of the staff, and make sure that they are accurate and appropriate. Other comrades also don't know the format and writing standard of the documents for the report. It is not a report for one thing, but a number of items for reference in a document submitted for instruction, so that the leaders don't know how to approve it. These problems must be highly valued by us. The correct decision intention of the party chief comes from the accurate information consultation of the organ. Fluent talk and accurate expression are not only related to the quality of ordinary work, but also the success or failure of wartime operations for our military organs. It is important to make vague and ill - spoken words. In this regard, there are profound lessons from all over the world.
Third, we should make a long story short. It is to be concise, concise and concise, and go straight to the theme. As a typical example, it may be known that in the early days of anti US aid to the DPRK, there were serious difficulties in logistics support for volunteer forces. There were only six words in the emergency telegram sent by President Peng to the Party Central Committee: hungry, without food and lack of clothes. Very simple. Only six words illustrate the status of the force and the needs of the volunteer forces. Some of our comrades, however, have been reporting in a series of nonsense. The longer the language is like a ramen, the more and more the ideas are not available for half a day. If there is a young staff member who summarizes and reports at the end of the year, he comes up with "in the past year, under the guidance of the superior business department, under the leadership of the group army and the Party committee head, with the help of the deputy director of the director...", the director has come to 56 "Xia" in a row. Before he has finished the "down" words, the director intercepts his words and says, "do you want to say you in the past year?", Under the leadership of the Party Central Committee with President Jiang as the core? Where are so many "down"? You said you did something this year, wouldn't you! " The long-term and long-term talk and procrastination are the taboo of reporting work, even the disrespect for the leaders. Why do leaders have so much time to listen to you reporting like storytelling? It is not a rule to give advice or good policies, but to open up the door and not to circle. It is very important that staff members can speak long and short, communicate with leaders in the shortest time. This is what is required by the characteristics of this particular group of our army.
Fourth, we should say it cleverly. When we are cadres of the organs, we should give suggestions to the heads for recognition and adoption, and sometimes we should speak some skills. Changing your mind often has a good effect. I saw such a very interesting and vivid story a time ago, saying that two monks practice Zen, and the addict of smoking wants to smoke and is afraid to break the commandments. One went to ask the master and asked, "can you smoke when practicing?", Immediately reprimanded by master; The other went to ask for advice and asked, "master, can you practice smoking at the same time?". "You have Buddha in your heart, of course," the master said happily. In the same way, a little change will result in different results. In fact, the essence lies in the speaker mastering the direction of the other party's thinking and the focus of attention. When we are the staff, we should make suggestions on reporting to the head, and also pay attention to the key issues and main thinking directions of leaders' attention, and focus on the key work of the army construction and the most concerned issues of the leaders.
Fifth, we should see the opportunity to say. The so-called "opportunity" means that we should pay attention to the opportunity and occasion of asking for instructions and reporting. Let me give you a few examples. Let's think about it: the head of the board is opening the Standing Committee (Research cadres), and you come in with a folder. Is that appropriate? The head is receiving local staff. Would it be appropriate for you to report confidential matters without any help? The chief is calling, you don't know to avoid it, so standing in the head office is silly, is it appropriate? For example, you follow the chief and go down to the army. The chief is trapped and wants to rest on the car for a while. You don't see the head's mood and interest, and you can talk about it all the time. Is it appropriate? Sometimes, the head of the Organization convened a meeting, made a summary speech and asked if you have any comments. The one thing that the meeting would listen to was polite words. It means that the meeting is over and the directors will not speak again. Do you stand up as the staff member and say, "chief, I have a suggestion". Is that appropriate? What have you done? wait. It's funny to say, but things like this often appear in our daily work. This is what the leaders often say is "not sensible" or "no eye". Further, it is also a personal cultivation problem for cadres of the organs. Therefore, when we are cadres of the organs, we should not ignore the time and occasion of the report. How to grasp it, without me to say more, we all know that only some of our comrades do not pay much attention to or often ignore these sections in their work. You pay attention to these, grasp the fire, can play the due reporting effect, the head will also feel you have a good eye, handle the right thing. In this way, the head and our organs will have a very good understanding. Of course, in case of any emergency that can not be delayed, you should not take any time or occasion into account. The report should be reported in time. The head will not be bothered and blamed.
Another point is to ask for instructions to report according to the procedures. Reporting in case of an accident is the basic procedure for asking for instructions and reporting, and also the basic common sense that an organ cadre should have. In general, our organs have done well in this regard. Now there is a situation that needs to be corrected well. It is that an agency comes to ask for advice and report, and the head has approved it. You have done the same. The leader of the undertaking results does not know. For example, one of our headquarters sent me a petition, which I saw and passed on to the chief of staff for approval. The chief of staff needed the approval of the chief of staff at first glance. After the examination and approval of the chief of the army, the staff took them back and gave them the orders, but they never answered. Not only did I not know the results of the undertaking, neither the chief of staff nor the chief of military knew. This is a problem of information transmission is not in place and reporting procedures are missing. Here, I would like to emphasize that our organs should pay attention to information feedback in the future when they ask for instructions and report, and develop the habit of "return to return to the back". We should give feedback to everything and respond to each item. This is an essential procedure for requesting instructions for reporting. In this way, it is convenient for the head to know the situation in time. Moreover, the Department organizes activities, sends a telegram and a notice, and cannot send it to the head in charge and the force. If the work is finished, it is necessary to remember to send a copy to other heads and departments so that other heads can timely grasp the situation of the force and let other departments know what the force is doing. This is also an aspect that our organs need to make up for and pay attention to in the report of request for instructions.
3、 Pay attention to methods, think and do well in investigation and research
Investigation and research is a methodological science with strict and scientific characteristics and excellent art. It is the basic leading method of our Communist Party and the basic skills that the cadres of the organs must master. Chairman Mao said, "without investigation, there will be no right to speak.". I think it can also be said that if we do not conduct investigation and research, we can not be regarded as a competent cadre of the organs. When we do the work of the organs, we often go to the army to inspect and guide the work and conduct investigation and research. Some comrades can find problems and provide valuable information and consultation for the decision-making of the Party committee leaders. Some comrades said that the army went on like this, without preparation for investigation and without research topics; Or no problem can be found; Or if you find any problems, you can go online; And, the problem has been found, but it can't extract things and find solutions. This shows that some of our comrades have not mastered the procedure and methods of investigation and research, and have not treated the investigation and research as an art. So, how can we do a good job in investigation and research? There are many experiences in this field, and there are all books about the work of the organs. I hope that comrades should pay attention to learning and learning. Here, I want to make an exchange with you on some basic issues that need to be grasped in order to do a good job in investigation and research. The main points are as follows:
First, we should know what leaders want. It is to understand the intention of the party chief accurately. This is what we must pay attention to at any time to do well in the work of the organs. If the party chief does not understand the intention of the Party committee head and fails to implement it according to the intention of the party chief, the work of the organs will be scattered and the army will not talk about centralized reunification. We must understand a common sense. We should check and guide the work, conduct investigation and research, etc., and the whole work of the organ is carried out around the intention of the party chief. Now, before our organs get off the army, the heads of the government concerned will basically convene a meeting. This meeting, is the chief is telling you what he wants. As for some special deployment of the investigation and research topics, we should grasp the intention of the party chief, understand thoroughly. Only if you know what the leader wants, you can know what to look up and then think about how to look up. For example, when conducting security inspection, the head said: we will go on this time, mainly to check the problems. As a result, you came back to report. The whole story was a great situation of the army security. The chief didn't hear any problems for a long time. Your investigation is meaningless. Therefore, we have been able to inspect and investigate the troops, and we have accurately understood the intention of the party chief, and we know what the leaders want, and we have grasped the direction of work and the focus of the investigation. This is very important.
Second, we should know what to look up. Theoretically speaking, it is necessary to prepare for investigation and research. This is very important to do a good job in investigation and research, but it is often ignored by some comrades. The reason why we can not find out the problem or find out the problem and don't know what to do is that the preparation before the investigation is not enough. How to prepare? What are you going to prepare for? First, we should select the subject of quasi investigation. It is to focus on "what leaders want", list the research content that you think can reflect the intention of the party chief, and where to investigate, find who to investigate and what materials will be collected, and list them one by one before the investigation. These are the things you're going to look up. Knowing what to look up, you will be able to investigate and aim at it, and you can avoid the problem of "fish in the water," blind people riding blind horses, and not knowing where to go ". Then, we should put forward scientific research hypotheses according to the selected research topics. What is the research hypothesis? It is the assumption of the object of investigation and its relationship with the related phenomena. In other words, it is necessary to make clear the specific investigation ideas. This kind of idea and thought is based on scientific theory and practical experience, not made up by imagination and by virtue of the sky, but it is to be verified by you in the investigation. It can make the research subject more specific, and it can help you to collect materials and analyze and think while you are investigating, and play a guiding role in indicating the direction of thinking. Some of our comrades have made full preparations in advance for the quick investigation and the high quality of the reports. Another point is to prepare some relevant information. This is also an indispensable preparation before the investigation. Go down to find out what, before going, we should prepare the policies and regulations that the research topic may involve and the relevant information so as to be able to timely compare the policies and regulations in the investigation, draw lessons from the relevant experience, and make the investigation more targeted.
Third, we should know what the method is. What I'm talking about is a question of "how to look up.". This is the most critical link to determine the quality of investigation and research. There are many methods of investigation, such as listening to reports and field surveys, comprehensive investigation and typical surveys, questionnaire survey and opening of symposiums, etc. You know it, too. But there is often a situation where the same method is used to work, and you can use it to get nothing. Why is that? This is an art and practical experience of investigation and research, which I want to emphasize today. So how can we use the methods of investigation and research well, dig out the deep contradictions and real problems that leaders pay attention to and the army exist, and make accurate and real first-hand materials available? This is a practical methodology problem. It depends on people constantly groping, accumulating and summarizing in practice according to their own experiences and experiences. It is not possible to rely on others to tell and copy the rigid set. Some things are not good for words. But some basic elements must be grasped. First, I will listen. We go down to the investigation and listen to the reports. It sounds wonderful, so you think they do a good job. To this, you should keep awake, listen to the voice, do not listen to the report, you will be moved and believe. Which doesn't want to say it in good ways? If it is that, you remember it first, and then check it. Second, I will see. It should be known that the respondents generally have a certain psychological defense. The hidden things often happen. The scenes you show may be carefully arranged in advance. More of the problems you want to understand are not wanted to be seen by others. Don't be confused by one scene. In this regard, we should learn from Premier Wen Jiabao, break through his defensive psychology and often let the respondents feel unprepared to obtain the real situation. Third, I will say. It's also an investigation attitude issue. Don't put out a set of high-rise shelves, ask a question to speak to arrogant people. In a service provider's attitude, the party chief shall tell the party chief's intention and your investigation plan, and the place where others need to cooperate, and calmly tell the respondents that they can establish good interpersonal relationship with the respondents, respect the personality and privacy of the investigated person, so as to obtain the understanding and support of others. In this regard, comrades of our organs should learn from the leaders of our group army. The leaders of our group army have strong affinity, and we should know that "the official without shelf is the real official". Put down the shelf, people will tell you the truth, the truth. Fourth, we should be able to find objects. The target can be found correctly, which can improve the efficiency and quality of the investigation. If it is not found well, it is possible to be busy and can not find the problems and bring the troops a lot of trouble. What kind of respondents are suitable for? It is to find the "objects" related to the research subject, representative in work, typical in units, special in personnel and hierarchical to the materials you want to collect. This is called "taking shortcuts", which can often achieve twice the effect of half the effort, etc. Grasp these basic elements, flexibly use the survey methods in good books, and add your attitude of seeking truth and practicality, not reaching the goal, we can improve the quality of our investigation and find out what you want.
Fourth, we need to know what to do after I come back. What do you do back? As you all know, to write an investigation report, you should report to the leader. Here, I just want to state one point: without good ideas, I can't write good articles. In a narrow sense, as a carrier of research results, the survey report is just a common style, and it is not difficult to master. Anyone can write a report, but it is not easy to write a high-quality and significant survey report. This requires us to put our efforts into "thinking out". Where does the idea come from? Chairman Mao said that we should come from practice. In terms of investigation and research, we should learn from our deep understanding of the intention of the party chief, accurate grasp of relevant policies and regulations, and in-depth analysis, scientific judgment, careful reasoning and thinking refining of investigation materials. All the work done in the preliminary investigation, the large amount of materials and data collected are prepared for our "post production". What we should do after returning is to make a hard and detailed analysis and summary of the materials and data obtained from the investigation. Through deep and repeated rational thinking, we can extract valuable ideas and Research Countermeasures for the decision-making of the party leaders. In a word, we should make the vivid materials from the investigation into "crafts". Otherwise, the report is a plain and light pile of words, and all the work you did in your previous investigation will become "walking through the field". This requires us investigators to pay attention to the perceptual knowledge from investigation and raise them to rational thinking to solve problems through the phenomenon. The purpose is to reveal the essential rules of the army construction contained in the investigation materials objectively, truthfully and accurately, and put forward the solutions and suggestions to solve the problems in a clear, pragmatic and creative way, so that the investigation results become the decision basis of the Party committee leaders and be used to guide the actual work. Only by achieving this goal can the investigation and research be successful.
4、 Communicate in time, actively negotiate and strengthen work coordination
Coordination is a common task in the work of the organs. The purpose is to achieve unity of thought, policy and pace, so that all departments at all levels can form a joint effort and work together. It is not the local saying that "work is meeting, management is charge, coordination is drunk". Some people have summed up the work as "one big and two difficult". The so-called big one lies in its wide coverage, coordination everywhere, and there is no time and time. Where conflicts appear, coordination should be followed up; The so-called difficulty lies in the coordination between people, each has its own opinions and has its own basis; Coordination is also a non power work, which can only be negotiated, explained and mediated with the other party, and cannot be ordered. Coordination is very important to do well in the work of the organs, and it is also a basic skill required by the cadres of the organs. With this basic work, we can deal with all aspects of relations better, open up the channel for the work, and make full use of various positive factors to improve the efficiency of work. Many comrades in our organs have rich experience in this regard. But there are also problems such as the deviation of conveying spirit, understanding intention bias, forgetting things missing and coordinating in time and not in place. Here I focus on some basic issues to grasp in coordination work, and talk about my own experience.
First, respect each other. Coordination is to deal with people. Respect for and understanding of people is the minimum requirement. As the saying goes, "if you want people to respect themselves, you must respect yourself first", "people respect me a foot, I respect one Zhang". If we don't pay attention to this, it is difficult to do anything that is easy to coordinate. From the perspective of work, coordination is no more than solving contradictions. For the coordinator, most of the problems to coordinate are the work problems, and it is completely normal to have such or some contradictions. This also determines that we must "not be right to people" when we do coordination work, respect each other, consider problems from other side's perspective, fully listen to and adopt reasonable opinions and suggestions from others. In particular, the units in charge of power, money and things should, according to the objective conditions, proceed from maintaining the overall situation, being conducive to work, and coordinate objectively and fairly. We must not proceed from personal good and evil, feel emotional and be kind to each other. For example, some units or personnel ask you to do something, as long as it is not a matter of principle, they can not "be the boss", one-sided emphasis on "no compromise", press not to do; We should not go against the intention of leadership and follow the so-called "mass line" without principle. On the basis of full consultation, we should make good "fine adjustment" to ensure that we do not violate the policy and regulations, but also conform to the objective reality and facilitate the work.
Second, we should be familiar with the personnel. As the saying goes, "acquaintances do things well.". What we talk about is to pay attention to interpersonal communication, and it is easy to communicate when coordinating. The same thing, find someone you know, and meet a person who asks "your name" to coordinate, and how the result is self-evident. When people are familiar, they can produce a harmonious atmosphere and a compatible psychology, and it will be much more smooth to coordinate. Some people conclude that modern people's success needs to have two factors: one is excellent ability quality, the other is good interpersonal relationship. As the saying goes, "a good man and three help.". A person, no matter how smart and capable, to do a good job requires the help of others. The people with strong coordination ability are mostly good interpersonal, or give others good feelings or people are familiar with you. It's hard to imagine that you don't know how to set up the institutions of the superior business departments, who are the leaders in charge of the brigade and the head of the counterpart business section. Can you coordinate your work well? Impossible things. This requires us to work hard on familiar personnel, especially to keep in touch with our superior and subordinate counterpart business departments, friendly neighbor units and internal personnel of the organization. In this way, a successful pass can be achieved to create a good environment for work coordination. Of course, to communicate with people, we should also keep a clear mind, distinguish whether public transport or private intercourse is not separated from good and bad, and we should be friends; We should not take communication as the name, public and private, and confuse work and personal life.
Third, we should discuss and handle it. It is in coordination that we should weigh the words and not carry the brand. Although our cadres are in accordance with the leadership instructions to coordinate their work, they cannot do the same as the "two heads", and put forward a set of pretext of acting with the purpose and threatening the emperor to order the princes. To know the coordination power given by the Leadership Committee, it can only be used as the basis for adjusting contradictions and solving problems. It is impossible to become a chip to improve your identity. Even if it is to convey the leadership instructions, it is necessary to make full explanation that the leader cannot dominate others by the tone of leadership. This is not only a method of coordination, but also a principle of coordination. Because there is no direct subordinate relationship between the two parties, it is impossible to use the administrative order method and the command language. Only by consulting with each other more, making clear the truth with a moderate breeze and rain, and finding common ground for dealing with the problems can the problem be properly solved. If you have a stiff attitude and impose your own opinions on people, the problem will not be solved. Even the coordination of the related matters of the subordinate forces should be prevented from being simple and rigid. As an organ cadre, as long as it is a matter of coordination, we should negotiate and handle them. We must not have hierarchy in mind. We cannot feel that their level is higher than others, but they are superior to each other. In case of contradiction, they will force their will on the other side with pride, ignore each other and ignore their legitimate rights. Of course, we can't lose the principle of dealing with conflicts because of being courteous. If you are afraid of that, you can tolerate it. You should strive for it without being humble and active.
Fourth, we should grasp the proper position. That is, coordination work should be in place but not offside. If the coordination is not in place, it is a breach of duty, and offside is a "foul". Although the specific procedures for coordination work are not clearly defined in many cases and the boundary of offside is sometimes not well understood, in any case, things beyond the scope of authority cannot be done, work procedures can not be violated, and reports can not be submitted for further reference. The coordination of the organs is essentially to assist the head. This has a question of responsibility and authority. In general, it is flexible to handle the situation without violating the general intention of the head. Otherwise, we cannot take the lead without authorization. In particular, for the coordination of some major matters, timely request for report and strictly follow the intention of the head. From the perspective of the procedure of coordination, there are three situations: one is that the report needs to be asked from the bottom up, and the report should be submitted step by step according to the procedure and division of labor; The other is that the leader can be directly asked for instructions. Before and after reporting to the leader, it is necessary to communicate with the direct leaders of the Department in a timely manner; In another case, when a special emergency is encountered, the direct leader is not in office and can not wait. It can simplify the procedure, report while handling, or report to the leader after handling. We cannot see procedural work as a problem and burden, but as a necessary stage of coordination. In addition, coordination work should prevent and overcome the tendency of "emphasizing human feelings and worldliness, neglecting principle and discipline". The exchanges among cadres of the organs are extensive, involving both the upper and lower levels and the various aspects. The relationship and human relationship in communication are often unavoidable. It is understandable that some things are done perfectly. However, there are limits to the human sentiment and worldliness, and must not exceed the limits of principle and discipline. Only the coordination of human feelings and rules and disciplines is satisfactory, but at the same time, hidden dangers may be planted, which leads to the adverse consequences of "things are done, mistakes have been made". This degree must be grasped.
Fifth, we should listen to it. It is to pay attention to the harmonious language art“ All the four sides should be coordinated by one mouth. Can talk round both ends, can not say two tired. A word can be done as a big thing or a bad one. Reasonable and proper language can not only express the intention of coordination, but also can enter the brain, and realize the communication with the coordination object as soon as possible, so as to make it accept happily. First, respect each other when speaking. Use more of the tone of discussion, and do not speak in a commanding tone. Although you are implementing the instructions of the head, don't forget that all of us are government cadres. Using the instructions of the head to crush people can not only achieve the purpose of coordination, but also hurt the harmony and affect the feelings. Secondly, the intention should be clearly expressed. Use words must be accurate, and the instructions of the superior and the intention of the leaders should be used to regulate their own language. They should not be "crooked mouth monks", open their mouths and go in tune so that they don't know what you want him to do. Thirdly, pay attention to the interest in speaking. We should make efforts to make people listen to each other and be willing to listen to it by making efforts in the vivid and flexible language and enhancing the attraction, appeal and persuasion. Never talk about choking. It is irritating to choke. Besides, we should grasp the language. For coordination, it is not derogatory to see who says what to say. In coordination with parallel organs and departments, the tone of language should be mutual respect and consultation tone, but also should not give up the principle of big; For the coordination of leaders, the tone of language is often in the tone of asking for instructions, humility and inquiry. In short, language is a college question. How to use it properly and listen to it in speech depends on the people's heart in practice.
5、 Understand the intention, be fully prepared, and do a good job as an attendant
It is a regular task for cadres to follow their leaders to participate in activities organized by higher authorities, local governments or friendly neighboring forces, or to conduct investigation, research, inspection and guidance in the next army. How to do a good job of the entourage and make the chief satisfied, as an organ cadre, we need to grasp and pay attention to it. There are also a lot of jokes and appearances in this respect. For example, when starting out, the chief decides what time and where to board the bus. Some of them don't pay attention to the amount of advance, so they let the chief wait for you there; On the way, some of them didn't know how to get there, didn't figure it out in advance, and pretended to be very clear, so they took the wrong way to the chief; When you come back, the chief said goodbye. The leader who saw you off has already got on the bus and is ready to leave. You are still shaking hands with others one by one under the bus to say goodbye. Some even can't find anyone, and so on. These are all things with names and surnames. I believe everyone has met them. Some people once summed up some of our staff officers following the chief of the army as "being late for departure, sleeping with a car, calling for meals, pouring as soon as you drink, and asking for nothing". Although the work of an entourage does not take as much time as writing materials, it can reflect the experience and accomplishment of an official. How to do this work well? I think we should focus on the following five aspects.
First, be familiar with the chief. To be familiar with the chief is the premise of doing a good job. If you are not familiar with the chief and do not know about him in advance, it is difficult to do a good job in his entourage. For example, where the chief wants to go, there are many old comrades in arms, so he may visit them in his spare time. If you know about this situation, you can be prepared in advance. Once the chief says he wants to go, you can contact him in time and lead the way to visit or visit him, so there will be no delay; If the chief executive has the habit of getting up early and taking a walk, you don't know, and gets up on time or wants to sleep in. In the morning, if the chief executive wants you to take a walk with him or make a temporary arrangement, you will be unprepared. How to get familiar with the chief? The key is that we should pay more attention at ordinary times and learn more about the work and living habits of the chief, so that we can get familiar with them gradually. If you are a new chief executive, or if you are not familiar with the chief executive when you are on a business trip with him for the first time, you should ask his drivers, civil servants, officials who are familiar with the chief executive, and even those who are familiar with his old unit for information. As long as we pay attention to this problem, we can do it. The key is to have this awareness.
Second, be considerate. As the saying goes: "be ready before you go, there is less trouble on the way.". As we all know, the key to preparing for going out with the chief is to think carefully and be fully prepared. In my opinion, there are four aspects to be done: one is to make clear what to do. After accepting the task of going out with the chief, we should understand the intention and specific task of the chief in time, and ask if we are not clear. Second, we should bring all the things we need. There will be many inconveniences when you go out. You should bring all the necessary things before you leave. It's both comprehensive and easy to carry things. It's easy to miss things if you don't prepare well, and it's cumbersome to bring too many things. The third is to understand how to go on the road. If the route has been passed before, and the distance is not far, it is easier to lead the way. If you are leading the way for the first time, and the distance is long, you should not only look it up on the map, but also know it from the insiders, so as to make sure that you have a clear idea. Don't pretend to understand, lead the way blindly, make jokes and delay things. Fourth, be prepared for what the chief executive may ask. Leaders often use their travel time to ask questions and learn about relevant situations. For example: the relevant policies and regulations of the project, the basic information of the unit, and so on. If you don't make preparations in advance, the chief will think it's useless to take you; If you have prepared in advance, you can not only respond calmly, but also take the initiative to introduce some information to the chief, who will feel that "this cadre can do it.".
Third, behave in a dignified manner. As the chief's entourage, whether it's going to inspect and guide the troops, or participating in the activities of the superior and neighboring units, or whether it's going to meet the chief in public places or in private, you should be soberly aware that you are an office cadre and the chief's entourage. You can't be coy or pretentious, and you can't be foolhardy or swagger, We should be strict with ourselves and be decent in our words and deeds. In real life, some government officials are not doing well. Some are too timid in public and too casual in private; Some drink a few glasses of wine, do not know how old they are, walk around, holding a cigarette, holding a leader's waist, brotherhood. Following the leader, your words and deeds not only represent yourself, but also reflect the intention of the leader, and represent the image of the first level organ. You can neither take advantage of the power of the leader, nor lose your identity to agree with others. Especially when you follow the commander in the army, you should be strict with yourself in life, and don't give the army any trouble. We should see that after the chief arrived in the army, the comrades below have made great efforts to take care of your life. Don't put forward any non demands to embarrass the subordinates, let alone show dissatisfaction or even make use of the excuse. Don't look at these trifles in life, they have a bad influence on the relationship between superiors and subordinates, the image of the chief and your personal image.
Fourth, live in your eyes. Government officials should be observant and attentive, and observe problems in a sensitive and meticulous way. That is to say, they always think about things in their heads and live in their eyes. Why do some cadres give their leaders and comrades the impression of being very clever, while others feel numb? The fundamental difference is that the former has a lively eye, while the latter is confused. For example, other leaders in the vicinity of the unit should visit the leader, and the entourage should meet him at a place convenient for observation. When the visiting vehicle arrives near the camp, he should inform the leader in time that he can't wait in the room, but he is also in the room, and the visitor doesn't know when he arrives at the door. The entourage should always think about things in his mind and take the initiative to serve the chief. In particular, common sense things should not be allowed to be said and done by the chief. For example, when a chief comes to a unit, he should take the initiative to introduce the relevant personnel and briefly explain his intention; Before participating in each activity, it is necessary to supervise and inspect the preparation work in time, and inform the relevant personnel to arrive at the activity site in advance to meet them; In the process of the chief's work, he should not leave casually, but should do a good job of assistance at any time; If the chief executive proposes to see a certain leader or go to some place, he should greet the relevant units and personnel in advance; If conditions permit, spare time activities should be arranged, etc. In a word, during the period of following the chief, the entourage should always lean up, use their brains, arrange everything well, and strive to make the chief's work and life more pleasant.
Fifthly, the reaction should be smart. The attendant's work is not only to deliver cigarettes and water, but also to arrange accommodation. In that case, the chief should take a civil servant. The so-called smart response is to achieve: without waiting for the chief to finish speaking, you will know the following content; Without waiting for the chief to speak out, you will be able to understand the meaning. I would like to emphasize that the entourage should give advice and ideas to the chief at the right time. In this respect, the directors of our organs have done a good job. For example, when they go to the brigade and regiment to inspect and guide their work, the leaders of the brigade and regiment often ask questions when they report to the leaders, which need to be answered by the leaders. Some directors can quickly explain and explain the relevant policies within their scope of work, as well as the work of their own business, so as to buy time for the leaders to answer questions. When talking with the chief executive, you should pretend to be a little confused and ask him to give you more advice to show his cleverness. That's smart. When we are working in government departments, we often have to face a number of heads, and the heads inevitably have different opinions. You should try to find the combination of the heads' opinions, learn to make ends meet for the heads, do not pass on words that are not conducive to communication and unity, and take appropriate measures to delay or avoid them, so as to weaken the positive tone and intense emotion of the heads at that time, Avoid head-on confrontation of different opinions. When it is found that the chief executive studies a certain problem, or there is something wrong with the brewing decision-making, the entourage should try to enlighten the leaders. In 203 BC, when the battle between Chu and Han was very fierce, Han Xin sent a letter to Liu Bang to ask him to be the false king of Qi. Liu Bang was furious when he saw it. But at that time, the situation was very unfavorable to Liu Bang, which could not prevent Han Xin from becoming king. If we don't agree to his request, it will be difficult to clean up the situation in case of defection. At this time, counselor Zhang Liang quickly pulled Liu Bang's sleeve with his hand and whispered. Liu Bang immediately changed his words and said, "the eldest man calms down the princes and becomes a real king. How can he become a fake king?"? In this way, Liu Bang went through the difficulties with dignity. Zhang Liang's work is very beautiful.
The work of government organs is a big article. It's really learned. If you let the comrades here speak, I believe they can speak very well. I'm just talking about my own views based on my own working experience. If there is something wrong, I'd like to be criticized and corrected.
Copyright © 2021 Anhui Sinoocean Union Construction Co.,Led. www.asuc.com.cn Record No.: wanicp No. 19018562-2 Technical support: zhishengyuan
Contact information
Tel: 0551-65971663
Fax: 0551-63500142
Postal Code: 230061
Website: www.asuc.com.cn
Address: 11th floor, block a, Caizhi center, No. 959, south 2nd Ring Road, Hefei, Anhui, China
Anhui zhonghailian Construction Co., Ltd
ASUC